You are what you wear

Mostly it were men who tried to decide what a woman was allowed to wear or not. In the past clothing was restricted by the views of the macho male society, where women often came on the second plane. Today there are still societies where women are paid less for the same function or same job. Equality is in many countries still not there.

 

A lot of men also consider a woman not yet able to decide for herself and therefore want to impose laws telling what women may not wear because otherwise they could be dominated by their own husband or family. By imposing restricting laws do they themselves not want to have enough power over women, and let others belief that really woman are not able to decide for themselves what religion to chose and how devout they want to be?

In a civilised society that claims to want freedom for all, freedom for religious thought and religious development should be allowed. We should not try to impose our religious ideas or morals to others and certainly when they are trying to be more dignified than the majority of the population which want to play with morals or not to take it so serious.

 

In our so called democratic free state everybody should have a voice which will be encountered with respect. Liberty should be given to each person to go on a search for spiritual and religious values. And we should know and respect that not all are on the same level at the same time. We should allow each person to be on his/her own personal spiritual and life journey.

 

Who has the right to impose our own ideas of spirituality and morality on other women and still claim that we live in a free world?

 

Today we listen to a 22 year old South African Muslim woman, (Sabeehah M.) who spent about 12 years growing up in Europe, as well as an additional 3 years there, pursuing higher education and residing alone in a different country to my parents and a opinionated and ambitious woman (Shaazia E.) who perhaps like dismantling stereotypes about women who wear lipstick, look at the burkini affair in Europe.

Shaazia E. finds that women have always been judged by what they wear and that we can find several times men staring and whispering about women.  Concerning the Muslim and Western women she notes also that may people wonder of their upbringing and how their covering or non-covering says a lot about that upbringing or about their limitation brought on by religion or by others.

 

She also looks at what happened on the French beach

On Wednesday, the article circulating of three armed men forcing a woman to remove her clothes on a beach in France shocked people into a semblance of humanity (Well, most people anyway)

And said

Nobody should have to go through such humiliation and violation for the sake of their beliefs. But before we look at the French government with disdain, we need to understand that the amount of clothing a woman is wearing is not parallel to her morality.

 

Sabeehah M. noted

If you want to cover up for comfort at the beach, you might just be forced to undress by armed police. {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}

So you want to cover your legs at school… GASP, the audacity, you should be sent home! {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}

 

The ladies point at a danger coming to Europe as well, the same we condemn in the East, but created also here a Fashion Police or a Moral police who can come to you to humiliate you in front of the general public. Or like some police officers came to ‘help’ to undress a woman because it went not fast enough according to their liking, perhaps they can beat her up as well?

Perhaps you reject ‘Sharia’ dress code as an arbitrary concept. Careful, you could be next in line for a flogging. {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}

*

We remember from their writing

• uncovered, = immodest + lower standards of morality = odd assumption that women alone must behave modestly.
• whether in the East, West or somewhere between > if you’re a Muslim woman, > no say in what you wear. {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}
• woman’s modesty = subject dictated, controlled, judged, imposed by men, without including woman in the design, marginalising woman from the discussion, and without woman’s consent. {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}
• way you dress = influence people to be immoral + manifestation of how you have wrong morals. {Look Out, It’s the Fashion Police}
• we judge each other’s morals based on the amount of clothing we are wearing every day
• women can never win.
• in Islam women are supposed to act and dress modestly >>> But so should men
• why is this expectation emphasised + even imposed on women alone?
  A man should be covered from his navel to his knees in accordance with Islamic codes of modesty.
  A woman should cover her hair and conceal her body shape, only revealing her hands, feet and face.
• modesty = to be two-fold, both external + internal.
• careful of double standards of modesty

+

Preceding articles

Being Religious and Spiritual 2 Religiosity and spiritual life

Connection between women and environmental sustainability

Poverty and conservative role patterns

Women their education and chances to become a parliamentary

French showing to the whole world their fear and weaknesses

Does Banning Face Veils Help Us Fight Terrorism?

Islamism Rises from Europe’s Secularism

++

Additional reading

1. Women’s Groups Say Gender Equality is a Must for Sustainable Development
2. Gender connections
3. Gender equality and women’s rights in the post-2015 agenda
4. What is Racism??
5. Is Europe going to become a dictatorial bastion
6. On French beach French police forces woman to undress in public
7. Women in France running with naked bosom all right but with covered bosom penalised
8. France and the Burkini
9. Not limiting others but sharing peace with all
10. What we don’t say about the refugee crisis?
11. A charter for a truly free world and why we need it
12. When will it stop
13. ‘I try to keep my hate in check. If you can’t hate, you can’t love.’

+++

Further of interest

1. Fomo, Jomo, Somo
2. A Window to Look Through
3. Would You Trust These People with Our Planet?
4. Somewhere between the lines,we make a choice.
5. The Morality of Firefly.
6. Can You Be A Christian Doctor and Not Lose Your Morals
7. Morality and Society: Why Secularists Do Not Need A Holy Text
8. Why live a moral life?
9. You Only Cheat Yourself
10. Journey to Life
11. “Progressives” Act as if Bigotry/ Racism are the Worst Sins —- No, It’s Pride
12. Vladimir Putin: “One should not completely draw a line between the culture and the church.”
13. The Good And The Bad
14. Social, non-political, nudity observation
15. Are Bathing Suits Harmful to Others?
16. The Pastoral is Political: Don’t Tell Us How to Dress!
17. Burkini a boon for Muslim women
18. Bretons bathe fully clothed as Muslim asked to leave beach
19. Here’s to your burqini
20. French mayors dismiss suspended burqini ban
21. The Burqini Ban
22. British public heavily in favour of burqa ban: Poll
23. To bare or not to bare
24. Swimsuit Season : Burkinis and Man Boobs
25. This letter to the editor has gone viral… #BanSuits
26. Burkini Ban Suspended By French Court, But Sarkozy Says He’ll Keep The Law If Elected President.
27. 9/11 Truth Movement celebrates Muslim women’s new French fashion style!
28. Trying To Not Blog Politics
29. Im-Politic: Immigration’s Essential – but Elusive – Assimilation Dimension
30. What to Wear
31. Wonder Woman’s Burkini
32. What (not) to wear on a French beach this Summer
33. Hugh Fitzgerald: Jean-Louis Harouel On France’s “Marche Vers Dhimmitude”
34. Cannes burkini ban overturned after top French court ruling
35. Burkini Bans: The Iconography of Attire
36. Banal Ethnic Conflict and the Burkini
37. Banning The Burkini
38. Valls shouldn’t be surprised that there are whites who defend the burkini, ’cause it’s them who are bringing the muslims in.
39. The Burkini is About Sexual Violence Against Women
40. Let’s Do Secularism Right
41. To wear or not to wear: the battle of the bikinis
42. Belgian prime minister labels burkini ban as impractical
43. Burkini and the Breast: Sisters in Feminism
44. Can it Be Justified? The European Debate Over the Burka
45. Le burkini: a national debate
46. Burkini ban spikes sales
47. Have I Been Hiding? No, Just Writing ElsewhereLe port du Burkini n’est pas anodin et c’est une marocaine qui le dit.
48. Sous la plage les pavés

Related articles

• First burqa ban, now burkini ban: Why Europe prohibits full-body swimsuits for Muslim women
• The French Fashion Police: Armed police order Muslim woman to remove her burkini on Nice beach as as mother wearing Islamic headscarf is threatened with pepper spray and fined in Cannes
• Rational Review News Digest — the freedom movement’s daily newspaper
• French Minister – ‘We Are at War With an Enemy Trying to Pit Muslims Against Non-Muslims’ – Zionist Report
• French minister: ‘We are at war with an enemy trying to pit Muslims against non-Muslims’
• Sadiq Khan condemns ‘burkini’ ban ahead of Paris visit
• French government tries to defuse burkini row
• TechDirt: Nice Officials Say They’ll Sue Internet Users Who Share Photos Of French Fashion Police Fining Women In Burkinis
• Author: The ‘quiet conquest’ of Europe is well underway
• QUESTION: Nice, France Cops BUST Muslim Chick For Wearing A Burka On The Beach – Do You BLAME Them?

thesamoosarevolution

Women have always been judged by what they wear. In our society, the less clothing a woman wears the more she is considered immodest and indecent. A Muslim woman in shorts is a social pariah. Clusters of women or gatherings of men will stop and stare and whisper about her. She is looked at up and down. People wonder of her upbringing. People think because she is uncovered, she is immodest and has lower standards of morality. People have this odd assumption that women alone must behave modestly.

On Wednesday, the article circulating of three armed men forcing a woman to remove her clothes on a beach in France shocked people into a semblance of humanity (Well, most people anyway). I think what was the most striking was that the woman on the beach could have been us. It could have been me; it could have been you. It could have been…

View original post 503 more words